Hi,

We are having the following issue when trying to configure Azure SSO Authentication using Spring Security Oauth2:

{ json: { log: "2024-12-20 12:42:53,285 [http-nio-8090-exec-40] ERROR o.a.c.c.C.[.[.[.[dispatcherServlet] - Servlet.service() for servlet [dispatcherServlet] in context with path [] threw exception java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Attribute value for 'preferred_username' cannot be null at org.springframework.util.Assert.notNull(Assert.java:181) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.user.DefaultOAuth2User.(DefaultOAuth2User.java:72) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.userinfo.DefaultOAuth2UserService.loadUser(DefaultOAuth2UserService.java:99) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:115) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:68) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.authentication.OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.authenticate(OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.java:158) at org.springframework.security.authentication.ProviderManager.authenticate(ProviderManager.java:182) at org.springframework.security.authentication.ObservationAuthenticationManager.lambda$authenticate$1(ObservationAuthenticationManager.java:54) at io.micrometer.observation.Observation.observe(Observation.java:565) at org.springframework.security.authentication.ObservationAuthenticationManager.authenticate(ObservationAuthenticationManager.java:53) at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.web.OAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter.attemptAuthentication(OAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter.java:196) at org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:231) at

Seems linked to #15338.

If we use "sub" username attribute, there is no longer the issue (but sub cannot be mapped to an email on our system), but we can dump the user in an Oauth2AuthenticationSuccessHandler:

2024-12-20 08:19:46,820 [http-nio-8090-exec-7] ERROR - attrs={sub=xxxxxxx, ver=2.0, iss=https://login.microsoftonline.com/xxxxxx/v2.0, oid=xxxxx, preferred_username=username@mail.com, uti=xxxxxx, given_name=John, nonce=xxxx, picture=https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/photo/$value, tid=xxxxxx, aud=[xxxx], nbf=Fri Dec 20 08:14:45 UTC 2024, rh=xxxx, name=John Smith, exp=2024-12-20T09:19:45Z, family_name=Smith, iat=2024-12-20T08:14:45Z, email=username@mail.com}

The claims have "preferred_username" in Oauth2AuthenticationSuccessHandler but if we use any as user-name-attribute it fails with a null pointer exception (despite being in the user claims afterwards).

I believe the null check is done too early and claims seem to be filled afterwards.

We are using Spring Security 6.4.2, Spring Boot 3.4.1.

Comment From: jloisel

Code failing on Spring Security side:

    public DefaultOAuth2User(Collection<? extends GrantedAuthority> authorities, Map<String, Object> attributes,
            String nameAttributeKey) {
        Assert.notEmpty(attributes, "attributes cannot be empty");
        Assert.hasText(nameAttributeKey, "nameAttributeKey cannot be empty");
        Assert.notNull(attributes.get(nameAttributeKey),
                "Attribute value for '" + nameAttributeKey + "' cannot be null");

        this.authorities = (authorities != null)
                ? Collections.unmodifiableSet(new LinkedHashSet<>(this.sortAuthorities(authorities)))
                : Collections.unmodifiableSet(new LinkedHashSet<>(AuthorityUtils.NO_AUTHORITIES));
        this.attributes = Collections.unmodifiableMap(new LinkedHashMap<>(attributes));
        this.nameAttributeKey = nameAttributeKey;
    }

If we use "preferred_username" as attribute:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Attribute value for 'preferred_username' cannot be null
    at org.springframework.util.Assert.notNull(Assert.java:181)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.user.DefaultOAuth2User.<init>(DefaultOAuth2User.java:72)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.userinfo.DefaultOAuth2UserService.loadUser(DefaultOAuth2UserService.java:99)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:115)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:68)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.authentication.OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.authenticate(OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.java:158)

If we use "sub" as name attribute key, we are able to proceed further into our Oauth2AuthenticationSuccessHandler and log all user attributes:

  @Override
  public void onAuthenticationSuccess(
    final HttpServletRequest request,
    final HttpServletResponse response,
    final Authentication authentication) throws IOException {

    final OAuth2AuthenticationToken token = (OAuth2AuthenticationToken) authentication;
    final String registrationId = token.getAuthorizedClientRegistrationId();
    final OAuth2User p = token.getPrincipal();

    final Pair<String, String> pair = repository.getUsernameSuffixAndAllowedDomains(registrationId);
    final String username = lowerCase(getUsername(p, pair.getKey()));

    log.error(
      "[SSO] id='{}', username='{}', attrs='{}', domains='{}'",
      registrationId, username, p.getAttributes(), allowedDomains
    );
....
}

Where we can see that all attributes are there:

ERROR com.octoperf.tc - [SSO] Domain not allowed - id='azure', username='xxxxx', attrs='{sub=xxxxx, ver=2.0, iss=https://login.microsoftonline.com/xxxx/v2.0, oid=xxxx, preferred_username=user@mail.com, uti=sssss, given_name=John, nonce=xxxxx, picture=https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/photo/$value, tid=ssss, aud=[xxxx], nbf=Thu Jan 09 08:37:02 UTC 2025, rh=xxxx, name=User XX, exp=2025-01-09T09:42:02Z, family_name=XX, iat=2025-01-09T08:37:02Z, email=user@mail.com}', domains='mail.com'

That means, "preferred_username" is an attribute but it's not working, despite being there.

Comment From: jloisel

I have more info about the issue after debugging.

The issue is in OidcUserService:

@Override
    public OidcUser loadUser(OidcUserRequest userRequest) throws OAuth2AuthenticationException {
        Assert.notNull(userRequest, "userRequest cannot be null");
        OidcUserInfo userInfo = null;
        if (this.retrieveUserInfo.test(userRequest)) {
            OAuth2User oauth2User = this.oauth2UserService.loadUser(userRequest);
            Map<String, Object> claims = getClaims(userRequest, oauth2User);
            userInfo = new OidcUserInfo(claims);
            // https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#UserInfoResponse
            // 1) The sub (subject) Claim MUST always be returned in the UserInfo Response
            if (userInfo.getSubject() == null) {
                OAuth2Error oauth2Error = new OAuth2Error(INVALID_USER_INFO_RESPONSE_ERROR_CODE);
                throw new OAuth2AuthenticationException(oauth2Error, oauth2Error.toString());
            }
            // 2) Due to the possibility of token substitution attacks (see Section
            // 16.11),
            // the UserInfo Response is not guaranteed to be about the End-User
            // identified by the sub (subject) element of the ID Token.
            // The sub Claim in the UserInfo Response MUST be verified to exactly match
            // the sub Claim in the ID Token; if they do not match,
            // the UserInfo Response values MUST NOT be used.
            if (!userInfo.getSubject().equals(userRequest.getIdToken().getSubject())) {
                OAuth2Error oauth2Error = new OAuth2Error(INVALID_USER_INFO_RESPONSE_ERROR_CODE);
                throw new OAuth2AuthenticationException(oauth2Error, oauth2Error.toString());
            }
        }
        return this.oidcUserMapper.apply(userRequest, userInfo);
    }

First, the Oauth2 user is created using oauth2UserService:

OAuth2User oauth2User = this.oauth2UserService.loadUser(userRequest);

In this case, the user has only limited attributes (4 in our case, like "sub"). Later on:

return this.oidcUserMapper.apply(userRequest, userInfo);

Which delegates to:

org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserRequestUtils#getUser

This is where the DefaultOidcUser instance is created with all claims being available (coming from OidcIdToken.getClaims()).

The bug is in https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/blob/8e2a4bf3562133c78230ec5a96ec993c5c92374b/oauth2/oauth2-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/security/oauth2/core/user/DefaultOAuth2User.java#L72

        Assert.notNull(attributes.get(nameAttributeKey),
                "Attribute value for '" + nameAttributeKey + "' cannot be null");

Checking for nameAttributeKey here is too early. The first DefaultOauth2User being created has not the nameAttributeKey claim populated at this point. The claims are available later when querying the userinfo endpoint. Later on, Spring Security re-creates an instance of DefaultOidcUser with all the claims populated.

The bug has been introduced in this commit: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/commit/e69e0eb245436733d803a37ac012ab89097689f5

This check cannot be performed this early.

Comment From: jloisel

@jzheaux

Hi,

This bug is preventing us from using Oauth2 authentication. I suspect it's breaking any oauth2 integration which has the username-attribute claim provided by the userinfo endpoint. Can you please take a look?

Best Regards,

Comment From: jloisel

Associated pull request: #16546

Comment From: sjohnr

@jloisel thanks for following up on this, and apologies that we didn't see this earlier.

This bug is preventing us from using Oauth2 authentication. I suspect it's breaking any oauth2 integration which has the username-attribute claim provided by the userinfo endpoint. Can you please take a look?

I have personally used the user-name-attribute with (for example) Auth0 since this commit was introduced. It does work in that case. It sounds like the difference with Azure is that the claim is not coming in the id_token.

Can you please put together a minimal reproducer that includes your Spring Security @Configuration and any application.yml or properties for Spring Boot (with any credentials removed)? This will help me ensure I have your exact client-side setup. I can then set up a test with the SSO provider to reproduce.

Comment From: jloisel

Hi,

I understand you are probably quite busy! You will have to find a provider which doesn't provide the user-name-attribute in in the first claims. I don't know which other SSO provider works that way. We also have a Google SSO integration and this one works well (but all claims are provided by the first call).

You don't even need any specific Spring Security configuration. You can use a sample SSO, as long as you use Azure SSO (maybe other SSO providers working same way as Azure are broken too).

application.yml: (use your own clientId / clientSecret and TENANT_ID)

    spring.security.oauth2.client:
      registration:
        azure:
          client-id: XXX
          client-secret: XXX
          name: "Azure"
          scope: openid,profile,email
          client-authentication-method: client_secret_basic
          authorization-grant-type: authorization_code
          redirect-uri: "{baseUrl}/{action}/oauth2/code/{registrationId}"
          client-name: azure
      provider:
        azure:
          authorization-uri: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/TENANT_ID/oauth2/v2.0/authorize"
          token-uri: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/TENANT_ID/oauth2/v2.0/token"
          user-info-uri: "https://graph.microsoft.com/oidc/userinfo"
          jwk-set-uri: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/TENANT_ID/discovery/v2.0/keys"
          issuer-uri: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/TENANT_ID/v2.0"
          user-name-attribute: preferred_username

You can use the default login page and try to login. It will fail with a null pointer if the user-name-attribute is not provided in the first claims.

Comment From: sjohnr

You will have to find a provider which doesn't provide the user-name-attribute in in the first claims.

If I can't get a developer account, I often just write integrations tests or customize Spring Authorization Server to emulate the misbehaving or problematic provider. I can handle that no problem. Thanks for the config.

Comment From: jloisel

Hi @sjohnr

Do you have any update on this issue?

Regards,

Comment From: sjohnr

Not yet @jloisel. I will add this to my list for this week and see if I can look into it.

Comment From: sjohnr

Hi @jloisel, I have not attempted to test Azure directly, but I have a test set up with Spring Authorization Server and I can easily reproduce. The way I reproduced the issue was to ensure that the ID Token contains an preferred_username claim, but only request openid and email scopes. In that case, the UserInfo Endpoint would not return the preferred_username claim (despite it being in the ID token claims), resulting in the error you are seeing.

The preferred_username claim comes as part of the profile. I see that you have requested both profile and email scopes, which means both preferred_username and email claims should be present in the UserInfo response. However, you seem to be reporting that Azure is not returning the preferred_username claim in the UserInfo response. Can you please confirm that this is the case?

Have you tried setting user-name-attribute: email instead? Do you have the same issue if you do this?

Comment From: jloisel

Hi,

We have used "email" as well and it doesn't work, because Azure returns it via userinfo claims. Only "sub" attribute works, but it's an internal azure id which cannot be used as the username. Anything else fails with a null pointer.

Comment From: sjohnr

We have used "email" as well and it doesn't work, because Azure returns it via userinfo claims.

I think that would mean that it is not returned from the UserInfo endpoint. This would mean that Azure's UserInfo Endpoint is not spec-compliant.

Can you try something else for me? Please try commenting out the user-info-uri property so that the UserInfo endpoint is not called as part of the flow. If that doesn't work, you can also try removing email and profile from scope, which should also prevent the UserInfo endpoint from being called. Please let me know if either of those workarounds has any effect.

Comment From: jloisel

We had initially setup the sso integration with openid scope only. But, as it contained only cryptic fields like "sub", we could not map any of the fields to a valid username. We added email and profile scopes later on, with the result described before.

The userinfo endpoint being called is not the issue. It provides the correct and meaningful claims later on if we configure "user-name-attribute" with a claim such as "sub" (we did this trying to find out workarounds). It's just too late because Spring fails much earlier when trying to instantiate DefaultOauth2User and fails to find the user-name-attribute in the minimal claims.

I'm not sure what else I can do to convince you it's simply not working the way it's coded as of now. If the user-name-attribute claim is only provided by the userinfo endpoint, Spring fails with an NPE before getting to call the userinfo endpoint.

Comment From: sjohnr

Spring fails much earlier when trying to instantiate DefaultOauth2User and fails to find the user-name-attribute in the minimal claims.

The DefaultOAuth2User class is used to contain the claims from the UserInfo response. So it is in fact the UserInfo that is returning the minimal claims, which is missing preferred_username. It is instantiated first, which is why you see this error happening earlier.

The userinfo endpoint being called is not the issue. It provides the correct and meaningful claims later on if we configure "user-name-attribute" with a claim such as "sub" (we did this trying to find out workarounds).

The ID token contains the claims you are talking about here. Claims from both UserInfo and the ID token are later combined to create a DefaultOidcUser.

Please try the suggested workaround

Please try commenting out the user-info-uri property so that the UserInfo endpoint is not called as part of the flow.

and report back. I want to make sure I understand how the provider is behaving, as that is critical information for determining how to proceed.

Comment From: jloisel

Hi,

I have tested the following:

  • No userinfo endpoint provided, preferred_username as user-name-attribute` with just "openid" scope:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Attribute value for 'preferred_username' cannot be null
    at org.springframework.util.Assert.notNull(Assert.java:181)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.user.DefaultOAuth2User.<init>(DefaultOAuth2User.java:72)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.oidc.user.DefaultOidcUser.<init>(DefaultOidcUser.java:97)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserRequestUtils.getUser(OidcUserRequestUtils.java:94)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:136)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo.OidcUserService.loadUser(OidcUserService.java:68)
    at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.authentication.OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.authenticate(OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider.java:158)

Here is a screenshot debugging the claims just before it throws the NPE:

Image

  • Now, set "preferred_username" as user-name-attribute, set again userinfo endpoint and "openid" scope, still failing with NPE:

Image

Image

  • Testing with "sub" username attribute, openid,email,profile scopes and userinfo endpoint:

First stack:

<init>:71, DefaultOAuth2User (org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.user)
loadUser:99, DefaultOAuth2UserService (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.userinfo)
loadUser:115, OidcUserService (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
loadUser:68, OidcUserService (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
authenticate:158, OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.authentication)
authenticate:182, ProviderManager (org.springframework.security.authentication)
lambda$authenticate$1:54, ObservationAuthenticationManager (org.springframework.security.authentication)
get:-1, ObservationAuthenticationManager$$Lambda$2469/0x00007a0718cf1800 
....

Image

On second instantiation (withint the same flow of execution, later on), stack:

<init>:71, DefaultOAuth2User (org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.user)
<init>:97, DefaultOidcUser (org.springframework.security.oauth2.core.oidc.user)
getUser:94, OidcUserRequestUtils (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
apply:-1, OidcUserService$$Lambda$1831/0x00007a0718ae6620 (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
loadUser:136, OidcUserService (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
loadUser:68, OidcUserService (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.userinfo)
authenticate:158, OidcAuthorizationCodeAuthenticationProvider (org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.oidc.authentication)
authenticate:182, ProviderManager (org.springframework.security.authentication)
lambda$authenticate$1:54, ObservationAuthenticationManager (org.springframework.security.authentication)
get:-1, ObservationAuthenticationManager$$Lambda$2469/0x00007a0718cf1800 
....

Image

It does not fail NPE as "sub" is there on first instantiation, but not usable as a valid username.

When userinfo endpoint is provided, and scopes include "email,profile", then "preferred_username" is present the second time Spring instantiates the DefaultOauth2User. But, the first time, when the minimal Default2OauthUser is instantiated, the claim is not there.

I have hidden sensitive information in screenshots.

Comment From: sjohnr

Thanks @jloisel. Unfortunately, the combination I had hoped for, you have not tested yet according to the above. Apologies if I was unclear.

Please try commenting out the user-info-uri property but leave the scope as openid,email,profile and user-name-attribute as preferred_username. I can see based on your 3rd experiment that this will work, but want to make sure you can report that it works end-to-end in that case.

Comment From: jloisel

Hi,

Thanks for the suggestion! I tried it and it's working: (no user-info-uri and scope as openid,email,profile)

Image

I had tried many combinations of settings but didn't thought of removing the user-info-uri (as I thought it was mandatory to work).

I guess we can close the issue as it's a misconfiguration from our side.