Pandas version checks

  • [X] I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

  • [X] I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.

  • [ ] I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.

Reproducible Example

import pandas as pd
s = pd.Series([1.2e+03, 1.3e+17, 1.5e+17, 1.995e+03, 1.990e+03])
s.rolling(2).std()

Issue Description

The output is 

0             NaN
1    9.192388e+16
2    1.414214e+16
3    1.060660e+17
4    0.000000e+00
dtype: float64

In fact, for any values afterwards with a similar magnitude (e.g., 1.234e+03), the rolling std is always 0.

Expected Behavior

0             NaN
1    9.192388e+16
2    1.414214e+16
3    1.060660e+17
4    3.535534e+00
dtype: float64

Installed Versions

INSTALLED VERSIONS ------------------ commit : 0f437949513225922d851e9581723d82120684a6 python : 3.9.15.final.0 python-bits : 64 OS : Linux OS-release : 5.10.16.3-microsoft-standard-WSL2 Version : #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 22:23:49 UTC 2021 machine : x86_64 processor : x86_64 byteorder : little LC_ALL : None LANG : C.UTF-8 LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8 pandas : 2.0.3 numpy : 1.25.1 pytz : 2023.3 dateutil : 2.8.2 setuptools : 68.0.0 pip : 23.1.2 Cython : None pytest : None hypothesis : None sphinx : None blosc : None feather : None xlsxwriter : None lxml.etree : None html5lib : None pymysql : None psycopg2 : None jinja2 : 3.1.2 IPython : 8.7.0 pandas_datareader: None bs4 : 4.12.2 bottleneck : None brotli : 1.0.9 fastparquet : None fsspec : None gcsfs : None matplotlib : None numba : None numexpr : None odfpy : None openpyxl : None pandas_gbq : None pyarrow : None pyreadstat : None pyxlsb : None s3fs : None scipy : None snappy : None sqlalchemy : None tables : None tabulate : None xarray : None xlrd : None zstandard : None tzdata : 2023.3 qtpy : 2.3.1 pyqt5 : None

Comment From: jesse-sealand

Same issue:

python : 3.11.4 python-bits : 64 OS : Windows

Comment From: matsidzi

Possibly duplicate of #53289 (which is the duplicate of #52407).

Comment From: kaixiongg

Possibly duplicate of #53289 (which is the duplicate of #52407).

52407 has been already taken for one year without any update, maybe assign others to this task?

Comment From: rhshadrach

maybe assign others to this task?

We do not assign issues to contributors; contributors take what issues they are interested in working on.

Comment From: suzyahyah

take