What version of Go are you using (go version)?
$ go version go version go1.14.4 linux/amd64
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
yes (latest version in use)
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?
go env Output
$ go env GO111MODULE="" GOARCH="amd64" GOBIN="" GOCACHE="/home/[username removed]/.cache/go-build" GOENV="/home/[username removed]/.config/go/env" GOEXE="" GOFLAGS="" GOHOSTARCH="amd64" GOHOSTOS="linux" GOINSECURE="" GONOPROXY="github.com/[company name removed]/*,[company internal git hosting]/*" GONOSUMDB="github.com/[company name removed]/*,[company internal git hosting]/*" GOOS="linux" GOPATH="/home/[username removed]/go" GOPRIVATE="github.com/[company name removed]/*,[company internal git hosting]/*" GOPROXY="https://proxy.golang.org,direct" GOROOT="/opt/go" GOSUMDB="sum.golang.org" GOTMPDIR="" GOTOOLDIR="/opt/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64" GCCGO="gccgo" AR="ar" CC="gcc" CXX="g++" CGO_ENABLED="1" GOMOD="/home/[username removed]/dev/certman/webui/webui/go.mod" CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_CPPFLAGS="" CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2" PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config" GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build840948656=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches"
What did you do?
Using golang.org/x/crypto/acme (golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20200510223506-06a226fb4e37 in go.mod), I register an account with Lets Encrypt's staging v2 API and then call Client.Authorize(). This fails because Discover() returns a Directory with AuthzURL set to the empty string indicating the pre-authorization flow is not supported by the CA.
What did you expect to see?
Some form of The CA does not implement pre-authorization flow error message.
What did you see instead?
An error returned with text Post "": unsupported protocol scheme ""
Comment From: dmitshur
/cc @FiloSottile @x1ddos
Comment From: lz-dc
As per https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/crypto/acme?tab=doc#Directory ,
// AuthzURL is used to initiate identifier pre-authorization flow.
// Empty string indicates the flow is unsupported by the CA.
Also, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8555#section-7.1.1 clearly states that
If the ACME server does not implement pre-authorization
(Section 7.4.1), it MUST omit the "newAuthz" field of the directory.
Guess, the check has to be added by application using acme library.